|
MPTX
520: Risk
Management for Health Care Products
Instructors: Tony Chan, BEng, MEng, MBA, Guidant
Frances Richmond PhD, School of Pharmacy, USC
Additional speakers to be named
Course weight: 3
credits
Placement: Spring
2003 Orange County campus
Recommended Preparation:
Undergraduate degree
in pharmacy, medical or independent health sciences, engineering or equivalent
mix of post-secondary training and industry experience; enrollment in
MS (Regulatory Science) or permission of instructor
Introduction
and Purposes:
Medical products
are amongst the most highly regulated commodities on the market today
because many can pose large potential risks to human health. Management
of risk is a central part of quality assurance programs that are designed
to ensure that products are safe and effective. Recent regulations in
most developed countries insist on risk assessment and plans for risk
management as a central requirement prior to approval of clinical trials
or product commercialization. In this course, requirements for risk management
will be explored. Several formal methodologies exist to characterize and
manage risks in product design, manufacture and use in target populations.
Students with a basic knowledge of biomedical science and regulatory structures
will explore in depth some of these methods, including failure modes and
effects analysis, fault-tree analysis, human factors analysis and hazards
and critical control points analysis. When the course is over, students
should understand not only the methods available for analysis but also
the situations in which different methods will be most helpful. They should
be able to integrate this knowledge with scientific principles related
to the development of experimental protocols and testing paradigms, in
order to plan and manage complex research programs. They should also understand
the risks associated with product failures, including the legal consequences
of product liability, and the approaches that can be helpful in reducing
loss and controlling liability.
Some of the knowledge
and skills developed by the student should include the ability to:
- Identify where and when risk analysis is required by regulatory authorities
- Implement a failure modes and effects analysis or fault tree analysis
in product design
- Understand engineering approaches for assuring product safety and quality
- Understand the emerging trend in risk management in the US and Europe
- Design a human factors testing plan for an assigned device
- Develop a strategy for evaluating risk associated with a newly marketed
drug
- Identify the strengths and limitations of Hazard Analysis and Critical
Control Point (HACCP) and Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP)
- Organize an audit of insurance needs for a clinical trial
- Compare a situation in which a potential problem of product liability
was well handled with one that was badly handled
- Describe the requirements for post-marketing surveillance and adverse
event reporting
Some parts of the
course will be taught through case studies presented by the students.
An emphasis will be placed on relatively informal lecture formats in which
students are encouraged to ask and answer questions throughout the didactic
sessions. As part of a novel strategy to meet the needs of part-time as
well as full-time students, the course will be taught in a condensed period
of full days and evenings totaling 40 face-to-face hours.
Course
Requirements and Grades:
Midterm test 20%
Final examination 50%
Case study 30%
At the end of the course students should be able to demonstrate a competent
knowledge of the subject matter as appraised by formal examination. In
addition, students will be assigned to teams. Each team will be assigned
a case study in which an appropriate research or testing plan must be
developed for a medical device or in vitro diagnostic. The research plan
will be submitted as a paper and a brief class presentation.
The research paper
will be evaluated on the basis of the following criteria:
Clear introduction of the problem to be solved
Review of current guidelines and identification of regulatory requirements
Identification of other issues that affect testing plan
Specification of testing or research protocol
Identification of potential problems or biases that cannot be eliminated
Timeline and budget for the research or testing plan
Course Textbook
Glickman, TS (1991)
Readings in Risk. Johns Hopkins University Press.
The textbook will
be supplemented by a list of readings that will compliment the text. In
some cases in which the reading is necessary to cover topics outside of
the scope of the text, materials will be available in hand-outs.
Reader, containing
handouts, selected journal articles and news clippings
Attendance
and Conduct:
The Student Handbook,
SCampus and University Catalogue provide guidance regarding academic policies
and procedures. Students should regard the program as a part of their
professional development in which courtesy and responsibility are significant
factors in success. Thus, students are expected to communicate absences
from class and are expected to attend all examinations and class presentations.
Under normal circumstances, papers and exams must be submitted on or before
the scheduled deadlines. Failure to make appropriate arrangements in case
of justifiable delay will result in a penalty of 10% in the assigned mark
for the first two weeks of delay, and further penalties for additional
unapproved delays.
Textbook References
and Additional Readings:
N.B. Reference texts
and links are not updated regularly.
|